Tomás de Aquino responde à pergunta "É?" sobre singulares O que o "É" significa na proposição "Sócrates é".
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2025.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a22000007a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 20251014121120 | ||
| 003 | BR-CrsFAEV | ||
| 005 | 20251023092057.0 | ||
| 008 | 251014t2025||||it fr|p|||||||||||||eng|d | ||
| 022 | |a 1121-2179 | ||
| 040 | |a BR-CrsFAEV |b por |c BR-CrsFAEV | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Doolan, Gregory T., |d 19... |9 16036 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Tomás de Aquino responde à pergunta "É?" sobre singulares O que o "É" significa na proposição "Sócrates é". |
| 260 | |c 2025. | ||
| 300 | |a p. 27-47 ; | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a In this paper, I respond to the position of Lawrence Dewan and Stephen Brock that the answer to the question « Is it ? » is always made according to the sense of ‘is’ that signifies the truth of the composition of a proposition. Looking at Aquinas’s semantic theory, I argue that one exception to this rule concerns the answer to the « Is it ? » question when asked of a singular substance such as Socrates. In this case, the ‘is’ in the proposition « Socrates is » signifies the actuality of Socrates rather than the truth of the proposition. In the course of this investigation, I clarify aspects of Aquinas semantic theory as regards his views on the copula and its signification. | |
| 546 | |a Artigo em inglês. | ||
| 600 | 0 | 4 | |a Thomae de Aquino, |c O.P., s., |d 1225-1274 |9 6206 |
| 650 | 4 | |a Atualização. |9 14271 |x Atualidade. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Verum (verdade). |9 9874 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Relação. |9 14556 |x Consignação. Cópula. | |
| 773 | 0 | |0 23557 |9 30591 |d Roma : Armando, 1992- |o 18997 |t Acta philosophica : |w (CaOOAMICUS)000000025369 |x 1121-2179 |g 2025 - fasc. 1 | |
| 942 | |2 udc |c AC | ||
| 999 | |c 25959 |d 25959 | ||