Act and Action : Creation as the Communicative Action of God.

Furkejuvvon:
Bibliográfalaš dieđut
Váldodahkki: Velde, Rudi A. te, 1957-
Materiálatiipa: Artihkal
Giella:eaŋgalasgiella
Almmustuhtton: 2025.
Fáttát:
Fáddágilkorat: Lasit fáddágilkoriid
Eai fáddágilkorat, Lasit vuosttaš fáddágilkora!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a22000007a 4500
001 20251014114601
003 BR-CrsFAEV
005 20251015094229.0
008 251014t2025||||it fr|p|||||||||||||eng|d
022 |a 1121-2179 
040 |a BR-CrsFAEV  |b por  |c BR-CrsFAEV 
041 0 |a eng 
100 1 |a Velde, Rudi A. te,   |d 1957-   |9 16034 
245 1 0 |a Act and Action :   |b Creation as the Communicative Action of God. 
260 |c 2025. 
300 |a p. 13-25 ;  
520 3 |a This article explores the intimate relationship between act and action in Thomas Aquinas. According to Thomas, every agent acts insofar as it is in act, since it is proper to the act to communicate itself in its action. As applied to creation, this basic principle raises the question of God’s will : is there any place for a free will in God if his action flows directly from the act of his being ? This question is addressed together with a critical discussion of Norris Clarke’s philosophy of dynamic action. Clarke interprets the connection between act and action in the sense that ‘being manifests itself in self-communicative action’. The consequence of this view, I argue, is that the difference between the first act (the substantial act of a thing in itself) and the second act (operation) is obscured. 
546 |a Artigo em inglês. 
600 0 4 |a Thomae de Aquino,   |c O.P., s.,   |d 1225-1274  |9 6206 
600 1 4 |a Clarke, William Norris,   |d 1915-2008  |9 16035 
650 4 |a Neoplatonismo.  |9 13035 
650 4 |a Ação.  |9 13441  |x Agir. 
650 4 |a Ação.  |9 13441  |x Diferença entre o Primeiro Ato e o Segundo Ato em Criaturas. 
650 4 |a Trindade.  |9 13355 
773 0 |0 23557  |9 30591  |d Roma : Armando, 1992-  |o 18997  |t Acta philosophica :   |w (CaOOAMICUS)000000025369  |x 1121-2179  |g 2025 - fasc. 1 
942 |2 udc  |c AC 
999 |c 25958  |d 25958